Repository logo
  • English
  • Français
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs
  • Fundings & Projects
  • People
  • Statistics
  • English
  • Français
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Centre for Global Surgery
  3. Georges Bucyibaruta
  4. Assessing Compliance with the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in Rwanda and Malawi: A Mixed-Methods Study of Systemic and Behavioural Barriers
 
  • Details
Options

Assessing Compliance with the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in Rwanda and Malawi: A Mixed-Methods Study of Systemic and Behavioural Barriers

Journal
Impact Surgery
ISSN
3033-4470
Date Issued
2025-05-30
Author(s)
JC Allen Ingabire
Faustin Ntirenganya
Alphonsine Imanishimwe
Emmanuel Munyaneza
Isae Ncogoza
Georges Bucyibaruta
Rashid Ngalawango
Zaithwa Matemvu
Vanessa Msosa
DOI
10.62463/surgery.158
Abstract
<jats:p>Introduction: The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (WHO SSC) is a low-cost, high-impact tool shown to improve surgical outcomes and enhance safety culture, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite its effectiveness, adherence remains inconsistent across resource-constrained settings. This study evaluated WHO SSC availability and compliance in Rwandan and Malawian hospitals, identifying systemic and behavioural factors influencing implementation.
Methods: A prospective observational study and cross-sectional staff survey were conducted in 28 referral and district hospitals in Rwanda and Malawi. Surgical cases were selected using stratified random sampling, and checklist adherence was assessed via structured observation across the three checklist phases. Theatre staff completed questionnaires on checklist familiarity, training, and team dynamics. Statistical analysis included descriptive methods and generalised linear models to identify predictors of checklist availability and use.
Results: Of 602 surgical procedures observed, checklist availability was significantly higher in referral hospitals (62%) than in district hospitals (30%), and in elective (56%) versus emergency surgeries (38%). Availability was lower in Rwanda (31%) compared to Malawi (69%) (p < 0.01), yet Rwandan hospitals demonstrated superior adherence across all phases: Sign-In (estimate = 29.4, p < 0.01), Time-Out (15.8, p < 0.01), and Sign-Out (15.2, p < 0.01). Team presence during Time-Out increased checklist use eleven-fold (OR: 11.8, 95% CI: 6.56–21.33). Familiarity with the checklist and 5–10 years of experience also improved compliance.
Discussion: Despite broad awareness, checklist use in LMICs remains inconsistent due to logistical barriers and workforce dynamics. Targeted training, increased checklist availability, and digital tools may strengthen implementation and enhance surgical safety in under-resourced settings.</jats:p>
Subjects

Low- and Middle-Incom...

Rwanda

Malawi

Surgical Safety Check...

File(s)
No Thumbnail Available
Name

2.4.3_final.pdf

Size

827.19 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):f5220c18c10f2def39b0c5fcb76ec36a

  • logo.footer.image.logo
  • grid-colum.footer.image.logo
Rwanda:

Office Hours: 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
p: 0786.405.072
Kigali Heights, Plot 772
KG 7 Ave., 5th Floor
PO Box 6955
Kigali

United States:

Office Hours: 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
800 Boylston Street, Suite 300
Boston, MA 02199

Connect with us:

View our privacy policy.

If you are interested in working for the university, please visit our job board for open positions.

To get in touch with UGHE, please send us an email.

Copyright © 2024, UGHE.org All Rights Reserved

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback