Options
One Health in sub-Saharan African medical curricula: a cross-sectional, mixed-methods study
ISSN
2707-2800
Date Issued
2024-08-21
Author(s)
Esther Ntiyaduhanye
University of Global Health Equity
Evelyn Grace Bigini
University of Global Health Equity
Maria Albin Qambayot
University of Global Health Equity
Phaedra Henley
University of Global Health Equity
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj-oh.2024.14.20.42445
Abstract
Introduction: the One Health approach addresses human, animal, and ecosystem health. While important, there is little published information describing One Health training in medical education, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. This study aimed to explore One Health topics and competencies integrated into sub-Saharan African medical curricula, how they are integrated, and the benefits and barriers to integration.
Methods: in this cross-sectional, mixed methods study, purposive and snowball sampling were used to sample one Dean, administrator, or faculty member per identified medical education institution with self-reported knowledge about their institution's medical curriculum. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected using an online QualtricsXM survey and semi-structured interviews. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used for data analysis.
Results: sixty-one participants from 27 sub-Saharan African countries completed the survey. Among these participants, 23 also completed a semi-structured interview. The most commonly reported One Health topics and competencies integrated into medical curricula were epidemiology (n=56, 93.3%) and ethics and values (n=40, 66.7%). Interviewees linked zoonotic/vector-borne diseases, collaboration, and research with One Health. The most commonly cited benefit of One Health was "holistic patient care" (n=14, 48.3%). "Not enough time" (n=23, 53.3%) and "lack of faculty knowledge" (n=16, 88.9%) were the most common barriers to integrating One Health.
Conclusion: there are gaps in One Health integration into sub-Saharan African medical curricula. There are imminent needs to train medical teaching staff and future medical doctors to provide holistic, equity-focused care using One Health approaches.
Methods: in this cross-sectional, mixed methods study, purposive and snowball sampling were used to sample one Dean, administrator, or faculty member per identified medical education institution with self-reported knowledge about their institution's medical curriculum. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected using an online QualtricsXM survey and semi-structured interviews. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used for data analysis.
Results: sixty-one participants from 27 sub-Saharan African countries completed the survey. Among these participants, 23 also completed a semi-structured interview. The most commonly reported One Health topics and competencies integrated into medical curricula were epidemiology (n=56, 93.3%) and ethics and values (n=40, 66.7%). Interviewees linked zoonotic/vector-borne diseases, collaboration, and research with One Health. The most commonly cited benefit of One Health was "holistic patient care" (n=14, 48.3%). "Not enough time" (n=23, 53.3%) and "lack of faculty knowledge" (n=16, 88.9%) were the most common barriers to integrating One Health.
Conclusion: there are gaps in One Health integration into sub-Saharan African medical curricula. There are imminent needs to train medical teaching staff and future medical doctors to provide holistic, equity-focused care using One Health approaches.
File(s)
No Thumbnail Available
Name
20.pdf
Size
470.83 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):64deb21400a4fb599e524c8f74cff945